Savings math
A sample of the breakdown that shows where the indicative saving comes from.
Results explainer
This page walks through a realistic sample of the current post-contact results experience so you know what the real quote-result page looks like before you start.
TL;DR
The preview below is sample-only. It uses fabricated names, identifiers, dates, and numbers, but the structure is intentionally close to the real `/flow/result` page so users are not surprised after they share their details.
This preview mirrors the kind of quote-result page you land on after the real flow and contact step. It is static sample data, not a live result.
Next step
Your expert will be in touch via text message — usually within one business day.
No pressure and no commitment. On the real page this reassurance appears because expert follow-up is already set up by this point.
Fortnightly deduction
$642
Pre-tax. Everything included.
You save vs a car loan
$8,380
Compared to a standard car loan over the same term.
Olivia, here's the short version
Based on your salary, driving, and chosen EV, novated leasing looks like a strong option worth validating with a real provider quote.
The tax treatment is doing real work here, not just nudging the result.
The chosen EV price still sits in a range that looks workable for the salary entered.
The biggest variables left are employer policy, final rate, and provider fees.
Treat this as an indicative quote-style estimate. Your expert will confirm the exact numbers against your employer setup.
Generated by AI
On the real results page this summary is generated from the quiz answers, the chosen EV, and the saved quote inputs.
Got questions about your numbers?
The live page includes a real follow-up chat tied to your saved result.
One view across the same vehicle and term: novated lease, buying outright, and a standard car loan.
| Cost | Novated Lease | Buy Outright | Car Loan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle price | $49,990 | $49,990 | $49,990 |
| GST saving | -$4,545 | $0 | $0 |
| Monthly cost | $1,391 | $188 | $1,623 |
| Running costs (5 years) | Included ($11,280) | $11,280 | $11,280 |
| Income tax saving (5 years) | $17,350 | $0 | $0 |
| Total cost over 5 years | $58,860 | $61,270 | $67,240 |
| You save vs a car loan | You save $8,380 | - | - |
A sample of the breakdown that shows where the indicative saving comes from.

Dynamic
Drive-away price
$49,990
Lease term
5 years
Annual kilometres
15,000 km
Residual value
$14,147
This kind of result usually points to one chosen EV, not a shortlist-first screen. The page explains why this car was used for the quote and what assumptions sit behind it.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 460 km |
| Efficiency | 138 Wh/km |
| AC charging | 7 kW |
| DC charging | 110 kW |
| Seats | 5 |
| Boot space | 400 L |
| ANCAP | 5/5 |
| V2L | No |
Vehicle finance and lease repayment
Registration and compulsory charges
Comprehensive insurance
Servicing, maintenance, and tyres
Charging budget based on the quote assumptions
Which assumptions would change in my employer-backed quote?
What rate, residual value, and admin fees are you using?
How is the charging budget being estimated for my driving?
The live page opens with the fit badge, reference, generated date, and a first-name greeting. Right below that, it shows the big quote-style numbers users care about first: the fortnightly deduction and how the scenario compares with a car loan.
This is no longer an early-stage verdict screen. By this point, the result is tied to a chosen EV and a saved quote scenario.
Why the page starts here
The real page is designed to answer the practical question first: what does this look like in concrete numbers for this EV and this setup?
The AI summary block translates the result into plain language. It explains why the scenario looks good, what assumptions are doing the heavy lifting, and what still needs validating in the real quote process.
On the live page, this area also sets expectations for follow-up. The expert conversation is already underway, and the chat entry point appears as part of that context.
The comparison table anchors the result. It keeps the same vehicle and term in view while showing novated lease, buying outright, and a standard car loan side by side.
That table is the fastest way for users to see where the result is coming from without reading every line of the deeper breakdown.
This section is where the page becomes more literal. It shows the savings drivers and the fuller quote assumptions rather than leaving the result as a black box.
The point is not to overwhelm the user. It is to make the estimate legible enough that the expert conversation can focus on real variables, not vague trust issues.
The current experience is centered on one chosen EV. Users are not primarily dropped onto a shortlist of options anymore. They see one concrete vehicle card, the quote inputs tied to it, and a specs snapshot.
That makes the result feel closer to a real quote and easier to sanity-check against the car they actually care about.
By the time someone sees the real page, expert follow-up is already set up. The result explains the indicative numbers and gives the user a concrete list of questions and next-step context for that conversation.
This is a key shift from the older story. The page promise is no longer “optional help later if you want it.” It is “here is your estimate, and here is what the next conversation is for.”
Next step
This example is here to teach the structure. To see your own EV, your own numbers, and the real post-contact results page, go through the flow.
The real page still carries caveats clearly. Indicative quote assumptions, employer policy differences, rates, and fringe-benefit side effects can all move the final outcome.
That is why the sample preview keeps the caveat tone visible instead of pretending the numbers are fully settled at this stage.